<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cheap Arrows For Bows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com</link>
	<description>Best Place To Get Your Arrows Cheap</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 04:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pre words before The Review! by huyked</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/pre-words-before-the-review.html#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>huyked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 04:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/pre-words-before-the-review.html#comment-961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh my gosh!  1? hour long?!  That&#039;s how to do it!  Let me get my popcorn. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my gosh!  1? hour long?!  That&#8217;s how to do it!  Let me get my popcorn. <img src='http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pre words before The Review! by Greyarcher1 .</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/pre-words-before-the-review.html#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Greyarcher1 .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 04:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/pre-words-before-the-review.html#comment-960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:-)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A: What to look for when buying archery equipment? by targetbutt</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/qa-what-to-look-for-when-buying-archery-equipment.html#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>targetbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/qa-what-to-look-for-when-buying-archery-equipment.html#comment-959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there, glad you liked archery.  Which bow you need depend on a lot of things, budget(as in money), purpose, and time.  Those are the three top considerations.  There are three main types of bow, compound bow, olympic style recurve, and traditional bows.
Let&#039;s first cover time.  Time is how long it takes to become proficient with the bow.  If you&#039;re going hunting next week for example, then your only option is the compound.  It&#039;s the only one where you can pick up a bow and within an hour be quite proficient with it.  For an average beginner, the time it takes to become as proficient with an olympic recurve as that would be around 1 month.  For traditional bow then that time goes longer to 6 months.  It takes a long time and a lot more dedication to learn how to shoot a traditional bow compared to a compound.  The Olympic recurve is somewhere between the two, but closer in difficulty to the traditional bow rather than the compound.  Out of the three, I usually suggest the olympic recurve for beginners, simply because it forces you to use proper form to shoot or you won&#039;t hit the target at all, but at the same time it takes away the need to learn how to aim at the beginning.  The only difference between an olympic recurve and a traditional recurve is the olympic one has a sight.
Then there&#039;s purpose.  What are you planning to do with the bow.  Do you like to compete, do you want to hunt, or just for recreation?  How serious you plan to be with this sport determines where you need to start.  The more serious you plan to be, the lower the poundage you need to start with.  High poundage causes form problems that will be very hard to correct down the road.  If you have olympic dreams then the choice is clear, only olympic recurves are allowed there.  If you want to hunt quickly as said above, the compound is your best bet.
Last, budget.  Traditional bows are the cheapest to buy, if you&#039;re talking about the whole kit.  With traditional bows, all you need to buy is the bow, arrows, string, glove, arm guard, quiver, and bow stringer.  Olympic style recurve, you need to buy the bow, arrows, string, arrow rest, plunger, sight, finger tab, arm guard, quiver, later on you&#039;ll add clicker, stabilizer, chest protector.  Compound is the most expensive, not only are the accessories more expensive the maintenance also cost more.  You buy the bow, arrow rest, sight, stabilizer, release, arrows, quiver, arm guard, sound like a shorter list compared to the olympic recurve, but a compound sight can cost as much as double a recurve sight.  Arrow rests also cost a lot more, sometimes triple the recurve counter part.
When you buy arrows, I suggest you get aluminum for your first set, buy them already made.  Aluminums are durable and cheap.  When buying the aluminums request arrows with thick wall, wall thickness above 14/1000&quot; is preferred for durability.  You can get a set of world class aluminum arrows for $ 50/dozen, while crappy carbon arrows costs $ 100/dozen.
Good luck and good shooting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, glad you liked archery.  Which bow you need depend on a lot of things, budget(as in money), purpose, and time.  Those are the three top considerations.  There are three main types of bow, compound bow, olympic style recurve, and traditional bows.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s first cover time.  Time is how long it takes to become proficient with the bow.  If you&#8217;re going hunting next week for example, then your only option is the compound.  It&#8217;s the only one where you can pick up a bow and within an hour be quite proficient with it.  For an average beginner, the time it takes to become as proficient with an olympic recurve as that would be around 1 month.  For traditional bow then that time goes longer to 6 months.  It takes a long time and a lot more dedication to learn how to shoot a traditional bow compared to a compound.  The Olympic recurve is somewhere between the two, but closer in difficulty to the traditional bow rather than the compound.  Out of the three, I usually suggest the olympic recurve for beginners, simply because it forces you to use proper form to shoot or you won&#8217;t hit the target at all, but at the same time it takes away the need to learn how to aim at the beginning.  The only difference between an olympic recurve and a traditional recurve is the olympic one has a sight.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s purpose.  What are you planning to do with the bow.  Do you like to compete, do you want to hunt, or just for recreation?  How serious you plan to be with this sport determines where you need to start.  The more serious you plan to be, the lower the poundage you need to start with.  High poundage causes form problems that will be very hard to correct down the road.  If you have olympic dreams then the choice is clear, only olympic recurves are allowed there.  If you want to hunt quickly as said above, the compound is your best bet.</p>
<p>Last, budget.  Traditional bows are the cheapest to buy, if you&#8217;re talking about the whole kit.  With traditional bows, all you need to buy is the bow, arrows, string, glove, arm guard, quiver, and bow stringer.  Olympic style recurve, you need to buy the bow, arrows, string, arrow rest, plunger, sight, finger tab, arm guard, quiver, later on you&#8217;ll add clicker, stabilizer, chest protector.  Compound is the most expensive, not only are the accessories more expensive the maintenance also cost more.  You buy the bow, arrow rest, sight, stabilizer, release, arrows, quiver, arm guard, sound like a shorter list compared to the olympic recurve, but a compound sight can cost as much as double a recurve sight.  Arrow rests also cost a lot more, sometimes triple the recurve counter part.</p>
<p>When you buy arrows, I suggest you get aluminum for your first set, buy them already made.  Aluminums are durable and cheap.  When buying the aluminums request arrows with thick wall, wall thickness above 14/1000&#8243; is preferred for durability.  You can get a set of world class aluminum arrows for $ 50/dozen, while crappy carbon arrows costs $ 100/dozen.</p>
<p>Good luck and good shooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q&amp;A: What to look for when buying archery equipment? by JM</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/qa-what-to-look-for-when-buying-archery-equipment.html#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/qa-what-to-look-for-when-buying-archery-equipment.html#comment-958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The important thing you need to know is that you can&#039;t send your parents to buy you a bow. You&#039;ll need to be present, because if you&#039;re going to have a bow that will work with you it will need to fit correctly. This generally applies to compound bows, but you&#039;d also need some certain specs for a recurve to get enough force out of it. Draw Length, pounds of pull, and let off are all something to look into and consider. The MOST important thing is that it feels good to shoot. If you&#039;re really serious head to an archery shop for an afternoon and tell them you&#039;d like to buy a bow, but aren&#039;t sure what works for you. Don&#039;t let them get pushy about a Matthews Drenalin or a Bowtech General, get what feels good. Good luck, and good shooting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The important thing you need to know is that you can&#8217;t send your parents to buy you a bow. You&#8217;ll need to be present, because if you&#8217;re going to have a bow that will work with you it will need to fit correctly. This generally applies to compound bows, but you&#8217;d also need some certain specs for a recurve to get enough force out of it. Draw Length, pounds of pull, and let off are all something to look into and consider. The MOST important thing is that it feels good to shoot. If you&#8217;re really serious head to an archery shop for an afternoon and tell them you&#8217;d like to buy a bow, but aren&#8217;t sure what works for you. Don&#8217;t let them get pushy about a Matthews Drenalin or a Bowtech General, get what feels good. Good luck, and good shooting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What type of arrows should I use? by r</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/what-type-of-arrows-should-i-use.html#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/what-type-of-arrows-should-i-use.html#comment-956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PSE Optima is a good, solid bow of basic design.  You may use pretty much any arrow with this bow.  You more should be asking what purpose you want the arrows to fulfill.  Are you target shooting, hunting...I guess those are the two uses really.  (you could bow fish, but not really with this bow).
If you are just starting out, go with cheaper arrows.  You want arrows to be sized to your arm length so that you can fully draw the bow.  If you already know this to be 32&quot;, then you&#039;re good to go.  Once you&#039;re able to hit the target consistently, you can get graphite or carbon arrows without worrying about splintering them, but they can be expensive to replace, so I would start with wood or aluminum.
There are different heads for target or hunting.  You don&#039;t want to hit your target with broadhead hunting points as you will destroy the target.  You don&#039;t want to hit your prey with a target point because it will only prolong its suffering.
Your best bet is likely to get complete target arrows.  They will come with the arrow head, fletching (feathers), knock and be all ready to go.  I included a link below to the PSE arrows page, but their not cheap ones.  Try a big box store (Target, Walmart, Sports Authority, etc.) for cheaper arrows.
This information may be remedial for you if you have been shooting for awhile and I apologize.  If not, I hope it is useful and wish you luck.
http://pse-archery.com/c/carbon-force-arrows_ext-target-arrows-and-shafts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PSE Optima is a good, solid bow of basic design.  You may use pretty much any arrow with this bow.  You more should be asking what purpose you want the arrows to fulfill.  Are you target shooting, hunting&#8230;I guess those are the two uses really.  (you could bow fish, but not really with this bow).  </p>
<p>If you are just starting out, go with cheaper arrows.  You want arrows to be sized to your arm length so that you can fully draw the bow.  If you already know this to be 32&#8243;, then you&#8217;re good to go.  Once you&#8217;re able to hit the target consistently, you can get graphite or carbon arrows without worrying about splintering them, but they can be expensive to replace, so I would start with wood or aluminum.  </p>
<p>There are different heads for target or hunting.  You don&#8217;t want to hit your target with broadhead hunting points as you will destroy the target.  You don&#8217;t want to hit your prey with a target point because it will only prolong its suffering.  </p>
<p>Your best bet is likely to get complete target arrows.  They will come with the arrow head, fletching (feathers), knock and be all ready to go.  I included a link below to the PSE arrows page, but their not cheap ones.  Try a big box store (Target, Walmart, Sports Authority, etc.) for cheaper arrows.  </p>
<p>This information may be remedial for you if you have been shooting for awhile and I apologize.  If not, I hope it is useful and wish you luck.  </p>
<p><a href="http://pse-archery.com/c/carbon-force-arrows_ext-target-arrows-and-shafts" rel="nofollow">http://pse-archery.com/c/carbon-force-arrows_ext-target-arrows-and-shafts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translation of &#8220;cota&#8221; from Spanish to English? by jmrg11</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/translation-of-cota-from-spanish-to-english.html#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>jmrg11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 04:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/translation-of-cota-from-spanish-to-english.html#comment-955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you are taking about the architect&#039;s scales for houses or engineer&#039;s scale for electronics and so
1:100
1:1000
etc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are taking about the architect&#8217;s scales for houses or engineer&#8217;s scale for electronics and so</p>
<p>1:100<br />
1:1000<br />
etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translation of &#8220;cota&#8221; from Spanish to English? by Maria F</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/translation-of-cota-from-spanish-to-english.html#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 04:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/translation-of-cota-from-spanish-to-english.html#comment-954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cota = dimension
Medida real -&gt; you could use: real distance
Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering_drawing
Showing dimensions
The required sizes of features are conveyed through use of dimensions. Distances may be indicated with either of two standardized forms of dimension: linear and ordinate.
With linear dimensions, two parallel lines, called &quot;extension lines,&quot; spaced at the distance between two features, are shown at each of the features. A line perpendicular to the extension lines, called a &quot;dimension line,&quot; with arrows at its endpoints, is shown between, and terminating at, the extension lines. The distance is indicated numerically at the midpoint of the dimension line, either adjacent to it, or in a gap provided for it.
With ordinate dimensions, one horizontal and one vertical extension line establish an origin for the entire view. The origin is identified with zeroes placed at the ends of these extension lines. Distances along the x- and y-axes to other features are specified using other extension lines, with the distances indicated numerically at their ends.
Sizes of circular features are indicated using either diametral or radial dimensions. Radial dimensions use an &quot;R&quot; followed by the value for the radius; Diametral dimensions use a circle with forward-leaning diagonal line through it, called the diameter symbol, followed by the value for the diameter. A radially-aligned line with arrowhead pointing to the circular feature, called a leader, is used in conjunction with both diametral and radial dimensions. All types of dimensions are typically composed of two parts: the nominal value, which is the &quot;ideal&quot; size of the feature, and the tolerance, which specifies the amount that the value may vary above and below the nominal.
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing is a method of specifying the functional geometry of an object]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cota = dimension<br />
Medida real -> you could use: real distance</p>
<p>Wikipedia:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering_drawing" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering_drawing</a><br />
Showing dimensions<br />
The required sizes of features are conveyed through use of dimensions. Distances may be indicated with either of two standardized forms of dimension: linear and ordinate.</p>
<p>With linear dimensions, two parallel lines, called &#8220;extension lines,&#8221; spaced at the distance between two features, are shown at each of the features. A line perpendicular to the extension lines, called a &#8220;dimension line,&#8221; with arrows at its endpoints, is shown between, and terminating at, the extension lines. The distance is indicated numerically at the midpoint of the dimension line, either adjacent to it, or in a gap provided for it.<br />
With ordinate dimensions, one horizontal and one vertical extension line establish an origin for the entire view. The origin is identified with zeroes placed at the ends of these extension lines. Distances along the x- and y-axes to other features are specified using other extension lines, with the distances indicated numerically at their ends.<br />
Sizes of circular features are indicated using either diametral or radial dimensions. Radial dimensions use an &#8220;R&#8221; followed by the value for the radius; Diametral dimensions use a circle with forward-leaning diagonal line through it, called the diameter symbol, followed by the value for the diameter. A radially-aligned line with arrowhead pointing to the circular feature, called a leader, is used in conjunction with both diametral and radial dimensions. All types of dimensions are typically composed of two parts: the nominal value, which is the &#8220;ideal&#8221; size of the feature, and the tolerance, which specifies the amount that the value may vary above and below the nominal.</p>
<p>Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing is a method of specifying the functional geometry of an object</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translation of &#8220;cota&#8221; from Spanish to English? by Daniel C</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/translation-of-cota-from-spanish-to-english.html#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 04:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/translation-of-cota-from-spanish-to-english.html#comment-953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On plan use &#039;linea de cota&#039; for dimension lines, in real life use &#039;distancia entre dos puntos&#039;. Cota is used within a phrase as in &#039;linea de cota&#039;, &#039;cota del plano&#039; and may not stand alone, so use some other word such as &#039;punto&#039; (for point).
Addenda
The actual dimension (medida, por ejemplo 5 or 6) is what you write over the &#039;linea de cota&#039;. So you would say &#039;Actual dimension =6&#039; over the &#039;linea de cota&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On plan use &#8216;linea de cota&#8217; for dimension lines, in real life use &#8216;distancia entre dos puntos&#8217;. Cota is used within a phrase as in &#8216;linea de cota&#8217;, &#8216;cota del plano&#8217; and may not stand alone, so use some other word such as &#8216;punto&#8217; (for point).</p>
<p>Addenda<br />
The actual dimension (medida, por ejemplo 5 or 6) is what you write over the &#8216;linea de cota&#8217;. So you would say &#8216;Actual dimension =6&#8242; over the &#8216;linea de cota&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Translation of &#8220;cota&#8221; from Spanish to English? by Jassy</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/translation-of-cota-from-spanish-to-english.html#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Jassy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 04:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/translation-of-cota-from-spanish-to-english.html#comment-952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contour line or  also level set, isopleth, isoline, isogram or isarithm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contour_line]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contour line or  also level set, isopleth, isoline, isogram or isarithm<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contour_line" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contour_line</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A review of two rifle cases by GFO270</title>
		<link>http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/a-review-of-two-rifle-cases.html#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>GFO270</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 04:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheaparrowsforbows.com/a-review-of-two-rifle-cases.html#comment-951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the review! I think my next? case will have to be a Flambeau.  I have two of those Plano cases.  One single rifle one double.  I use the double for my AR and the single for my shotgun.  I find the single case very difficult for any rifle with a scope (impossible with an AR).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review! I think my next? case will have to be a Flambeau.  I have two of those Plano cases.  One single rifle one double.  I use the double for my AR and the single for my shotgun.  I find the single case very difficult for any rifle with a scope (impossible with an AR).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.301 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-18 11:13:28 -->
